climateprediction.net home page
Is this right?

Is this right?

Questions and Answers : Windows : Is this right?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
old_user92966

Send message
Joined: 16 Aug 05
Posts: 2
Credit: 2,084
RAC: 0
Message 15181 - Posted: 17 Aug 2005, 23:58:58 UTC

I\'m a noob here. I\'m just wondering if around 3.69 s/TS is right for my Athlon XP 3000+ 1 gig pc 2700 ram machine. Also, when I hit the projection and borders, half of the map doesn\'t show any borders at all, just temperatures, pressure, and rain. Any help?
ID: 15181 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Les Bayliss
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 04
Posts: 7629
Credit: 24,240,330
RAC: 0
Message 15182 - Posted: 18 Aug 2005, 0:27:15 UTC

The s/TS is probably about right.

What program are you using to see the viz?
There are 3: the builtin one, Martin Sykes CpView, and the Advanced Visualisation.
It will also be affected by your graphics card, (some ATI cards cause problems), and the hadsm version. (4.13 was created to fix the ATI problem).

ID: 15182 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
old_user92966

Send message
Joined: 16 Aug 05
Posts: 2
Credit: 2,084
RAC: 0
Message 15183 - Posted: 18 Aug 2005, 0:49:17 UTC - in response to Message 15182.  

> The s/TS is probably about right.
>
> What program are you using to see the viz?
> There are 3: the builtin one, Martin Sykes CpView, and the Advanced
> Visualisation.
> It will also be affected by your graphics card, (some ATI cards cause
> problems), and the hadsm version. (4.13 was created to fix the ATI problem).
>
>
>I've tried installing this SVI, i think it's the Advanced Visualisation, but it comes up with an error: Unable to change current directory to C:\Progra~1\CLIMAT~1\archive. lol >
ID: 15183 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
old_user2500

Send message
Joined: 28 Aug 04
Posts: 65
Credit: 9,636,280
RAC: 0
Message 15185 - Posted: 18 Aug 2005, 3:20:05 UTC - in response to Message 15183.  

3.69 s/TS seems a bit slow for an XP 3000. I am getting 2.72 s/TS on a Barton 2500. I am using PC3200 memory but the processor is running at stock speeds.

I have an Athlon 64 3000 running at 2.18 s/TS using Corsair value ram and another running at 2.42 s/TS using Samsung ram.

I am getting 3.69 s/TS on a Sempron 2600. I think that your machine should be doing better than my Sempron though.

All machines are running WinXP. I suspect that the mileage will vary on other operating systems though
ID: 15185 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile geophi
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 7 Aug 04
Posts: 2170
Credit: 64,555,907
RAC: 5,858
Message 15201 - Posted: 18 Aug 2005, 16:07:55 UTC

Yes, 3.69 is slow for that PC. Are you running the graphics while running the model? Persistently running graphics can really hit performance.
ID: 15201 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Questions and Answers : Windows : Is this right?

©2024 climateprediction.net