Questions and Answers :
Windows :
Sudden extra credits?
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 31 Aug 04 Posts: 145 Credit: 2,080,724 RAC: 753 |
A large number of my team members received a sudden influx of credit yesterday. People that normally earn 3-400 per day yesterday received thousands! Not everbody was so blessed, others that get credit every day received their normal quota. CPDN stats page showing the anomoly. Wave upon wave of demented avengers march cheerfully out of obscurity into the dream. |
Send message Joined: 13 Jan 06 Posts: 1498 Credit: 15,613,038 RAC: 0 |
Credit\'s per trickle increased fron 229 to 259.2 (which happens to be the number of timesteps in a model year, 25920 / 100) I presume to be fair this was then applied retrospectively. I haven\'t heard anything official, but I assume it was a deliberate change rather than a typo! (trickles / 10 = Seasonal Attribution\'s credit scheme). I'm a volunteer and my views are my own. News and Announcements and FAQ |
Send message Joined: 31 Aug 04 Posts: 145 Credit: 2,080,724 RAC: 753 |
Surely everyone should receive a boost then not just a random few. If you look at the stats page I linked, you\'ll see some who regularly contribute get nothing, others that have not contributed at all recently have got some, and variations in between. I seem to get 160.7 credits per trickle incidently. Wave upon wave of demented avengers march cheerfully out of obscurity into the dream. |
Send message Joined: 5 Aug 04 Posts: 907 Credit: 299,864 RAC: 0 |
if they\'re running the sulphur cycle they may get less than the current coupled model per trickle; I \"balanced\" the weighting yesterday to reflect that some models are harder to run. I think the credits per trickle should be pretty close, i.e. here\'s the table I use: +---------+-----------------------------------+-------------------+---------------------+ | modelid | description | timestep_per_year | credit_per_timestep | +---------+-----------------------------------+-------------------+---------------------+ | 1 | UK Met Office HADSM3 (Slab Model) | 17280 | 0.00875 | | 2 | HadSM3 with sulphur cycle | 17280 | 0.014875 | | 3 | HadCM3 Spinup Experiment | 25920 | 0.01 | | 4 | HadCM3L Coupled Model Experiment | 25920 | 0.01 | +---------+-----------------------------------+-------------------+---------------------+ so credits per timestep should be 259.2 for hadcm3l and 257.04 for sulphur cycle |
Send message Joined: 31 Aug 04 Posts: 145 Credit: 2,080,724 RAC: 753 |
So those running sulphur cycle that have not had their \"bonus\" yet will receive it today? Wave upon wave of demented avengers march cheerfully out of obscurity into the dream. |
Send message Joined: 5 Feb 05 Posts: 465 Credit: 1,914,189 RAC: 0 |
Is this retro? Meaning complete units, also? I saw a pretty good increase already, but I have not dug through to see if everything was done. |
Send message Joined: 7 Aug 04 Posts: 2184 Credit: 64,822,615 RAC: 5,275 |
So those running sulphur cycle that have not had their \"bonus\" yet will receive it today? No. Before this change, slab/sulphur\'s credits relative to the coupled model were inflated, or the coupled model\'s credits were deflated, however you want to look at it. When I went from a sulphur to a coupled model on the same PC, the RAC for that PC went quite a ways down, meaning that one wasn\'t getting near the same amount of credits for the same computer time. Now, this should fix the inequity. |
Send message Joined: 31 Aug 04 Posts: 145 Credit: 2,080,724 RAC: 753 |
I seem to recall my RAC dropping when I went from regular slabs to Sulphur cycle, that was never addressed. I can already see the rankings at a couple of the big team sites being screwed about. I suspect there will be more said about this. Wave upon wave of demented avengers march cheerfully out of obscurity into the dream. |
©2024 cpdn.org