Questions and Answers :
Windows :
hadcm3 5.15 vs hadcm3 5.40
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 19 Nov 06 Posts: 4 Credit: 139,930 RAC: 0 |
first of all, which are the optimizations used in 5.40 because I\'m also running 5.15 on my E4300 and from what i can approximate 5.40 is 20-25% faster (maybe is the SSE2?) second : one of my simulation just crashed (70%) http://climateapps2.oucs.ox.ac.uk/cpdnboinc/result.php?resultid=6335429 and could somebody have a look at it as I\'m afraid that this could be related to my oc\'ed E4300 (fsb 275) so i could back off a little bit third : I\'m thinking about getting a quad core, so when i\'ll change the motherboard (chipset) and the cpu, could i resume the runnings with my new cpu from the same HDD |
Send message Joined: 5 Feb 05 Posts: 465 Credit: 1,914,189 RAC: 0 |
third : I\'m thinking about getting a quad core, so when i\'ll change the motherboard (chipset) and the cpu, could i resume the runnings with my new cpu from the same HDD Most likely not without an OS reinstall. The chipset will be significantly different, along with the Hardware Access Layer, and several other things. M$ is not very good about this. Plus M$ will want to reregister itself. |
Send message Joined: 13 Jan 06 Posts: 1498 Credit: 15,613,038 RAC: 0 |
What you could do is take a backup of the full Boinc installation (when Boinc is shut down), and once you have the new system running, copy over the backup and install Boinc to exactly the same location. As long as you\'re using the same operating system it should work OK. As Pooh Bear says, when you\'re upgrading your system you may need to reinstall windows. I'm a volunteer and my views are my own. News and Announcements and FAQ |
Send message Joined: 19 Nov 06 Posts: 4 Credit: 139,930 RAC: 0 |
update... the 5.40 improvement over the 5.15 is ...1.79 over 1.86 sec/TS although the 5.40 uses around 33% more memory |
Send message Joined: 13 Jan 06 Posts: 1498 Credit: 15,613,038 RAC: 0 |
The main difference between 5.40 and 5.15 is that most of the disk activity (to temporary files such as .aswap) is now done in memory rather than to disk. So it uses 100MB instead of 70MB, but on the other hand only does 5% of the disk writing that the original did (you can see this in task manager/processes if you show the appropriate columns). I'm a volunteer and my views are my own. News and Announcements and FAQ |
©2024 cpdn.org